This week the group met to discuss ways of furthering our research, spurred on by this video of mice and people trying to find cheese in a maze. The starting questions were:
- How do we stay informed about emerging trends in our field and ensure our research aligns with the evolving priorities of journals and funding agencies?
- What new methodologies, interdisciplinary collaborations, or innovative ideas could we explore to differentiate our work and stay competitive?
- What proactive steps can we take to make our research team more adaptable to shifts in funding landscapes or academic publishing norms?
Because the group is as interdisciplinary as they come, the discussion soon devolved into the true meaning of cheese in an academic context (funding vs. something more intangible such as research ideas), what is the cheese for (applied vs. theoretical research), and, of course, who is in charge of sharing the cheese and can/should we try to influence their cheese-sharing decisions (funding organizations vs. academia itself). Other, more minor, subjects were raised, such as the possible existence of other things in the maze (there could be sausage, maybe?) and whether the walls of the maze are as solid as they look.
No definitive conclusions were reached.
We will continue this discussion in a few weeks, once the cheese chaos settles down and we’ve had some time to mull the questions over.